Cutting Component Costs With Multi-Shot Moulding

Traditionally, high volume metal and plastic or rubber component assemblies used in products such as pneumatic valves and cylinders, pumps and motors, have been constructed from a combination of materials that are bonded, welded or riveted together, writes Bob Parker of seal solutions specialist, Ceetak. While these construction techniques are effective, they can add considerably to component cost and weight. Moreover, the bonding process can create a number of problems: during assembly, with the need to purge all air pockets from the adhesives, and when in use where sudden changes in operating temperatures or pressures can result in differential expansion of the various materials. New developments in multi-shot plastic moulding techniques, however, have overcome these technical issues, at the same time improving component performance and quality, and reducing unit price. Multi-shot injection moulding techniques optimise the co-polymerisation characteristics of hard and soft plastics, with two or more thermoplastic and TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) rubber compounds being molecularly bonded using conventional injection moulding machines. There have been significant improvements in both mould tolerances and the level of control over process conditions. As a result, it is now possible to produce components by injecting hard plastic materials, then rotating the mould tool or using multiple tools or mould cavities to make further or simultaneous injections of TPEs to create single, integrated piece parts. These parts can be made in large volumes, to consistent quality standards and tight tolerances. A typical example is replacement parts for pneumatic valves, which are often produced from brass and rubber; by re-engineering the part using thermoplastic and TPE rubber compounds it is possible to cut costs by as much as 50%-80%, while maintaining identical standards of quality and producing better mechanical properties.

Previous Article Time: the hidden vulnerability of smart factories?
Next Article Air-con could produce more CO2 than whole of US by 2050
Related Posts
fonts/
or