Conveying: When Pole-Change Motors Give Way To Inverters

Conveying is a prime applications area for inverters, which bring greater control and efficiencies to the process. In this article, Helmut Greiner compares the use of pole-changing braked motors with that of combined inverter/geared motor drives, and provides some design pointers for those with special materials handling needs Hitherto, all those desirable aspects of a materials conveying system - soft starting, controlled deceleration, precise positioning (fixed cycle mode) and high efficiency - have been the province of the pole changing, three phase cage induction motor. Today, even more demands are being placed on conveying systems, not least being the need for higher speed and - most topical of all - the need to reduce energy consumption. These demands are now being met by inverter-fed steplessly adjustable drives - a variable speed drive installed remotely within the conveyor motor control system or an ac induction motor, gearbox and inverter module combination, providing everything you need at the point of power transmission. Figure 1 Conventional starting methods usually produce reduced acceleration torque and thus longer run-up times. Figure 1 illustrates this for direct online starting (Curve 1) and when conventional soft starting with reduced starting torque is used (Curve 2). Notice that the acceleration (angle 'a' in Figure 1) changes suddenly at the beginning and at the end of the process. This change in acceleration can be regarded as a 'jolt' represented by the derivative da/dt. Jolts are obviously undesirable when conveying unstable or sensitive products, or those that must remain precisely positioned on the conveyor belt. Curve 3 shows inverter controlled starting along a so-called 'sine ramp'. Here the inverter frequency is ramped up to a predetermined upper value over an adjustable time span. The rotor speed increases according to the rise in frequency, with the degree of slip needed for the particular torque requirement. Typical applications include any conveyor system for delicate products, such as rack drives, turntables and mobile welding robots. Figure 2 Conveying systems running in start/stop mode are served very well by pole-changing brake motors, typically those offering a 1:4 speed ratio. Some of these motors are available with speed ratios up to 1:10, but they cost nearly twice as much as the 1:4 ratio motor. Generally, the higher the running speed and the lower the permissible stopping tolerance (Stol), the greater is the speed ratio (R) required. Figure 2 provides a useful guide to the limits of such drive systems (note that PU=pole-changing motor drive and VF=inverter drive in the diagram). Showing the relationship between speed ratio and stopping tolerances for positioning conveyor drive systems, it suggests a limit for the application of pole-changing motors (R being 4 or less), and a point at which it is more appropriate to use inverter control (when R is greater than 10). Note also a fairly wide transitional range between R=4 and R=10, where both pole-changing motor and inverter drives are feasible solutions. This is largely down to cost considerations. Modern combined inverter/geared motor assemblies offer a very economic inverter based solution for conveyor drives up to 7.5kW. Remember, a pole-changing motor will also require a contactor (not so with inverters), some form of thermal protection (a circuit breaker comes as standard with an inverter) and additional wiring requirements. Depending upon the application, a careful cost analysis may also suggest the inverter/motor solution for applications requiring a speed ratio of less than 1:4. Controlled run-up versus DOL start When a motor is started on direct connection to the mains supply (direct on-line or DOL starting), the rotating

Previous Article Food skills shortages to be tackled with new initiative
Next Article On-demand bioprinted kidneys could help address organ donor shortages
Related Posts
fonts/
or