Cooling Tower Efficiency

Cooling tower fan motors can be operated more efficiently and at less cost if they are controlled by inverters. Malcolm Staff compares the traditional methods of control with modern inverter control and illustrates the sort of energy savings that can be expected Water cooled chillers provide the most efficient means of creating chilled water, being as much as 20% more efficient than their air cooled counterparts; and depending on climate, cooling towers are often the most energy efficient method of cooling the condenser water from chillers. Condenser water is sprayed into the cooling tower 'fill' (used to increase its surface area) and a fan blows air through the fill and sprayed water to aid evaporation, and hence the cooling effect. Cooled water is collected at the foot of the tower and is pumped back into the chiller condenser to repeat the cycle. Traditionally, in order to conserve energy, fans are run in on/off mode, driven by two-speed motors or sometimes fitted with variable pitch blades. The temperature of the condenser water leaving the cooling tower is the 'on/off' control parameter, and usually a wide temperature band is established, at the upper part of which the fan is cycled 'on' and at the lower end 'off'. The load on the chiller and the outside wetbulb temperature determine the cooling tower's operation profile. As the wetbulb temperature or system load decreases, the speed of the fan can be decreased (two-speed motor example) or the blade pitch adjusted accordingly. With inverter control, cooling tower fan speed can be precisely adjusted to maintain condenser water temperature, as well turned on and off. Some inverters (including products supplied into the HVAC industry by the author's company) are dedicated to this type of duty. As the fan drops below a certain speed, the effect it has on cooling the water becomes small; moreover, when a gearbox is incorporated, a minimum speed of 40-50% may be required. The customer-programmable minimum frequency setting of the inverter is available to maintain this minimum frequency, even if the feedback or speed reference calls for a lower speed. These inverters can also be programmed to enter a 'sleep' mode, which stops the fan until a higher speed is required. Similarly, undesirable system resonances can be avoided by programming the drive to bypass the offending frequencies. Calculating the saving The load profile indicates the amount of flow the system requires to satisfy its needs and must be studied carefully in order to calculate any savings accruing from an inverter installation. Figure 2 shows a typical load profile for a cooling tower, which will be used for the purpose of our calculation. Assuming a 30kW fan motor installation, the energy consumption during one year for a two-speed motor is compared with that of an inverter controlled motor (in this case a Danfoss VLT 6000 HVAC). The figures are shown in the table below and show energy savings in excess of 86%. Sensor location for optimum inverter fan control The temperature sensor should be located in the basin of the cooling tower of the return line to the condenser pump. The efficiency of a water cooled chiller varies with the condenser water return temperature; the cooler the return temperature, the more efficient the chiller. However, the energy consumption of the chiller needs to be compared with the energy consumption of the tower fans and condenser pumps required to optimise system efficiency. The ideal temperature varies with each installation and should be calculated. Once the optimum temperature has been determined, the drive can be used to maintain this temperature as system load and conditions modulate. At this point, its is worth comparing installation and maintenance costs associated with both methods of control. The two-speed motor system requires a pole-changing motor and appropriate con

Previous Article Air-con could produce more CO2 than whole of US by 2050
Next Article British energy companies team up to create first hydrogen network
Related Posts
fonts/
or