New heights for materials: Bridging the gap between simulation and experimental results

The frustration of trusting in a weather app that forecasts a sunny day, only to be drenched with rain, is a feeling that most people have experienced. The same discrepancy occurs in materials characterisation – without the right data inputs, outputs from modelling don’t always live up to reality. Here, Andrea Incardona, Application Engineer at Instron, explains how dynamic drop testing gives material developers confidence in their prototypes’ viability.

Font size:
Print

Computer-aided engineering (CAE) simulations require high-quality, well-defined and extensive data to yield reliable results. A significant amount of early characterisation work involves establishing basic properties such as density, stiffness, and tensile strength.

Quasi-static testing remains a fundamental technique for characterising material properties. However, although this method gives reliable outputs at ultra-low velocities, it’s less effective for characterising materials under impulsive loads, forcing scientists to extrapolate data gathered at a low velocity.


Read the full article in DPA's June 2025 issue


Previous Article Strictly Come Dancing shoemaker waltzes towards digital transformation
Next Article UK and Canada to boost public services with new tech and AI deal
Related Posts
fonts/
or