Furthermore, merging traditional ways of working with Industry 4.0 approaches can cause problems. For example, remote maintenance by equipment suppliers or subcontractors requires a connection to their network, which may be infected or have less stringent IT security. Likewise, any existing machines on the factory floor that lack digital identification and authentication functionality do not allow end users to be sure that operating instructions received by the network are from an authorised person and not a hacker. There is also the risk that the smart tags on components or the final product may be manipulated in a cyberattack.
Machinery suppliers and integrators must therefore optimise the cyber resilience of their connected components and systems, implementing security solutions from the start. For machinery end users, this means that analyses, assessments and tests should be pivotal in implementing appropriate security controls.
Read the full article in the May issue of DPA