Feature

Machine safety: is it on or off?

With the increased demand on our industrial workforce, many facilities are expanding the “do more with less” approach when it comes to machine safety.

07/09/2021 12:49:16

Font size:

Today, environmental, health and safety (EHS) and similar professionals are more likely to have their responsibilities expanded beyond programs such as Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) and Confined Space. They may now
be expected to design and test functional safety devices that, historically, were the responsibility of the plant engineer or equipment manufacturer.
However, there is still confusion about when to use
LOTO and when to use alternative protective measures (APM).

OSHA’s Control of Hazardous Energy regulation (1910.147) allows for alternative methodologies to be used, so long as they are “as effective
as Lockout/Tagout” for the task – and that’s where many companies run into problems. Often, companies use the exception clause to allow the employee to “create their own path” to
safety if Lockout/Tagout is impractical. But this should not increase the risk to employees.

These five steps will help you mitigate the risk associated with potential hazards...

Read the full article in DPA's September issue

Written By Sophia Bell

Sophia Bell is the Group Editor of DPA, Connectivity, and PBSI. She joined the team in 2020 as Assistant Editor after achieving a First-Class Honours BA in English Literature and Film Studies from the University of East Anglia. In her current role, she leads the editorial strategy, driving digital growth and ensuring each title continues to deliver trusted, relevant insight for engineering and manufacturing professionals.